The Quark Problem Solved (12/12/02)
SceneLink
 

Good news, Mac classicists: rumors are rampant that Mac OS 9 may have been quietly granted a reprieve. You may recall that Apple has been announcing the death of the "classic" Mac OS for quite a while, now; just check out this presentation on The Future of Mac OS 9 from the last MacHack-- thanks to faithful viewer John A. Vink for the tip (and the camerawork). Indeed, a few months back the company officially announced that, starting in 2003, new Macs would no longer boot into Mac OS 9 at all. As far as coffin nails go, that one looks to be pretty final.

Many people, however, see this decision as a gargantuan risk on Apple's part, since professionals who rely on specific applications and/or drivers which may run better (or only) in Mac OS 9 aren't likely to buy any new Macs until their tools gain Mac OS X support. There's a distinct possibility that Apple's gambit (obviously intended to force the slowpokes out there in Developerland to get on the stick and port to Mac OS X, already) will wind up depressing sales of pro Macs still further-- and those sales aren't looking too great to start with.

Well, here's where the rumors come in: according to Think Secret, representatives from Quark, currently the biggest bad boy when it comes to a lack of Mac OS X support, have been calling up important publishing customers to assure them that, despite Apple's claim to the contrary, Quark users "will still be able to buy Mac OS 9-booting hardware" after New Year's. Apparently the company is claiming that it "negotiated with Apple to ensure that XPress users would be able to buy new Mac OS 9-bootable Macs until the middle of next year." That could mean a couple of different things; either Apple has decided to hold off on killing Mac OS 9 bootability until later, or the company plans to keep offering existing hardware to any poor Quark-using saps who want to buy it, despite the fact that faster and ginchier Mac OS X-only Macs will be available.

If it's the latter, then we're really starting to believe all those folks who insist that Quark CEO Fred Ebrahimi is ninety-seven hues short of a Crayola Big Box. We've heard several anecdotes that indeed seem to place Fred at the top of the Crazy CEO Heap; we're not at liberty to repeat them, but suffice it to say that if they're true, several of the things Fred has done and said over the years makes Steve Jobs look like Saney McSane of the Saneville McSanes. And if he really thinks that publishing professionals are going to spend good money on last year's (er, this year's) hardware just to keep running Quark XPress in Mac OS 9, well, the men in white coats had better start reaching for their oversized butterfly nets. We can't wait to hear how this one turns out...

 
SceneLink (3888)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

Mash-ups and original music by AtAT's former Intern and Goddess-in-Training

Prim M at YouTube
 

The above scene was taken from the 12/12/02 episode:

December 12, 2002: Turns out we missed one-- there's a No Doubt iPod available, too. Meanwhile, Apple sues another employee for revealing trade secrets, but this guy might have bigger things to worry about, and Quark reportedly claims that its customers will continue to buy Mac OS 9-booting Macs until the middle of next year...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3886: Presenting... The LogoPod (12/12/02)   Whoops, looks like we missed one of those new-fangled celebrity iPods when we mentioned them yesterday; faithful viewer Larry (of MacMinute fame!) tipped us off to the fact that in addition to the fame-o-riffic Madonna, Tony Hawk, and Beck signature editions, Apple is also selling a limited edition No Doubt iPod, which features the band's logo laser-engraved on the back...

  • 3887: It's Worker Bee Redux (12/12/02)   Okay, granted, it's not exactly as heart-stoppingly significant as the whole "celebrity signatures on iPods" development, but we suspect there's at least a smidgen of drama to be extracted from Apple's latest tussle with Those Who Leak...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1240 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).