The Eye Of The 'Pod Holder (5/22/03)
SceneLink
 

Duck and cover, kiddies, because there's a fierce debate raging among the Apple community that shows every sign of escalating into a full-blown nuclear riot before the dust finally settles. Despite what you might guess, it has nothing to do with alleged PowerPC 970 benchmarks, whether all the buzz about "Panther piles" is really just one big poop joke, or aluminum vs. titanium and whose dad would win in a fight. No, by far the most heated controversy bubbling right now is this: Just what the heck color is the new iPod's backlight supposed to be, anyway?

For what it's worth, we know we're a smidgen late to this particular party, but from our perspective, it's really only just now starting to get good. It seems that several recent iPod customers got it into their heads that the backlights in the new third-generation units are supposed to be blue-- so when they discovered that they had white backlights just like the rest of us shmoes, they expressed disappointment ranging from "mild" to "volcano heat." We're not entirely sure where the "blue backlight" idea came from, but to be perfectly honest, we thought we had seen that listed as a feature, too, but that must just be the sleep deprivation talking; Apple's posted tech specs clearly state that the new iPods have a "white LED backlight," so we figure we just got confused by the occasional blue-tinted iPod photo floating around. The new iPods have white backlights; case closed.

Or is it? The iPodlounge just kicked the controversy back into high gear, with several eyewitness reports that new new iPods have startlingly different screens and backlights than old new iPods. Meaning, if you were one of the early adopters who snapped up a third-gen 'Pod when they first hit the shelves, you may in fact have screwed yourself out of a higher contrast screen and a backlight that is decidedly-- you guessed it-- bluer than what you've got. If you're obsessive enough that this issue is weighing heavily on your mind, take your old new iPod into an Apple retail store and compare it side-by-side to a new new iPod; even the low-res photo at the iPodlounge reveals a pretty noticeable contrast.

Now, some might argue that with all the unrest in the world today, few things rank as more trivial than whether one's backlight is slightly more or less blue than someone else's-- but those people are usually pretty easy to beat up. Start hoarding firearms and canned goods, because we strongly suspect that the Great Blue-White False Advertising Well Not Really Advertising But Whatever Scandal of 2003 will soon lead to rampaging mobs of irate iPod owners running amok and reducing Western civilization to a smoking pile of rubble. Gee, just imagine what would happen if the backlights were supposed to be purple.

 
SceneLink (3967)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 5/22/03 episode:

May 22, 2003: Does this iPod backlight look blue to you? How about now? Meanwhile, Steve Jobs sells his New York apartment, and three million pages of Microsoft memos are about to become "squeezably soft"...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3968: Steve Leaves (Big) Apple (5/22/03)   And this just in, still more from the "Stuff Everyone But Us May Well Have Already Heard About Ages Ago" Department: faithful viewer Kassandra notes that a recent New York Times article contains a quick mention about Steve Jobs having sold his San Remo duplex in New York City last month, which listed for $14.5 million...

  • 3969: Back From Whence It Came (5/22/03)   Too easy. Way too easy. "Shooting fish in a barrel with a fish-seeking barrel gun" easy. Man, sometimes the challenge in producing this show isn't adapting reality into something a little more dramatic; sometimes it's trying to come up with something to say beyond the obvious cheap shots which Microsoft is so famously adept at setting itself up for...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).